Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: Re: vanelteren


From   Ricardo Ovaldia <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: Re: vanelteren
Date   Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:36:38 -0700 (PDT)

Thank you Joseph. 
Yes, you are correct; conditional on the dam the
scores would be independent. My doubt arose because I
get a highly statistical difference where I was not
expecting one. The mean from the two culture mediums
are similar (9.2 vs. 10.2) and the medians and rage
are exactly the same:


                N   Mean  (SD)  Median    Min - Max
-----------------------------------------------------
Percent_0     7010   9.2 (8.2)   10.0    0.0 - 50.0
Percent_1	  7390  10.2 (9.2)   10.0    0.0 - 50.0
-----------------------------------------------------

However, -vanelteren- yields p=0.0054 (asymptotic)
p=0.002 (permutation based) and that seems strange:

. vanelteren percent, by(mm) strata(dam)

Generalized Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Ranksum Test (van
Elteren's Test)
                                              
Variance of
                       Weighted    Expected    
Weighted
   Stratum   |   n   | Ranksum   | Ranksum  |  
Ranksum
-------------+-------+-----------+----------+-------------
           1 |    6  |    1.00   |    1.0   |    0.068
           2 |    2  |    0.50   |    0.5   |    0.000
           3 |    4  |    1.00   |    1.0   |    0.000
           4 |    3  |    1.00   |    1.0   |    0.042
.
.
.

         234 |    6  |    1.57   |    1.0   |    0.087
         235 |    9  |    1.40   |    2.0   |    0.113
         236 |    6  |    0.86   |    1.0   |    0.084
-------------+-------+-----------+----------+-------------
    Sums     |1,485  |   375.02  |  363.0   |   
18.646

Asymptotic test statistic
z =   2.784
Prob(Z > |z|) =  .0054


Regards,
Ricardo

--- Joseph Coveney <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ricardo Ovaldia wrote:
> 
> I am a bit concerned about using -vanelteren- on
> these data. My understanding 
> is that this test performs a rank-sum test for each
> dam and then constructs a 
> weighted linear combination of these Wilcoxon
> statistics. My problem is that 
> the rank-sum
> test assumes that you have two independent samples,
> however in my case, the 
> embryos allocated to the two medias come from the
> same dam and thus are not 
> independent within strata (dam).
> 
> Is the test still valid?
> 
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> You can think of van Elteren's test as analogous to
> an analysis of variance 
> with a blocking factor.  In the normal case, you
> would have -anova embryo_score 
> culture_medium dam-.  Dam is a blocking factor
> within levels of which you 
> anticipate clustering of scores.  Conditional on
> dam, however, the scores would 
> be independent.
> 
> One common use of the van Elteren test is with
> clinic as the stratification 
> variable in a multicenter clinical study.  van
> Elteren's test is used in lieu 
> of randomized blocks ANOVA with clinics as blocks. 
> Instead of -anova response 
> treatment clinic- (or perhaps -xtmixed response
> treatment || clinic:-), you'd 
> have -vanelteren response, by(treatment)
> strata(clinic)-.
> 
> Joseph Coveney
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *  
> http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 


Ricardo Ovaldia, MS
Statistician 
Oklahoma City, OK


		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index