[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
David Jacobs <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
Re: st: Fixed Effects estimation with time-invariant variables |

Date |
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:44:12 -0400 |

It gives you a period specific estimate of the time-invariant variables effects. Such estimates can be instructive. For example, by not forcing the coefficients on the explanatory variable to be the same in different periods, you may find that a variable you thought did not matter does. Such an analysis also can tell you if the effect in question is increasing or decreasing in strength.

Dave Jacobs

At 06:44 AM 7/27/2005 -0400, you wrote:

I do not understand why one would do that? Rather, what purpose would it serve?

Best,

Alice

From: David Jacobs <[email protected]>_________________________________________________________________

Reply-To: [email protected]

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: st: Fixed Effects estimation with time-invariant variables

Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:08:11 -0400

If you create interaction terms between between three of the four possible dummies computed on your periods and multiply these dummies by one of your time invariant explanatory variables, your fixed-effects equation will produce estimates for these interacted "ex" time-invariant effects. See Charles Halaby's piece on panel estimation in an Annual Review of Sociology about two to four years ago.

Dave Jacobs

At 01:56 PM 7/26/2005 +0100, you wrote:

Fixed Effects estimation with time-invariant variables I have a problem and I wonder whether anyone can help. I have a panel dataset of 32 Sub-Saharan African countries and four time periods (N=32, T=4). I am looking at the determinants of aid for these countries. Given that they are not randomly selected countries, I am using Fixed Effects. However, I have a few time-invariant variables that are important but that get dropped because of using FE. Is there any way of obtaining estimates for these time-invariant variables and still use FE? Also, given the data I'm using, is there any justification for using Random Effects? Any comments would be much appreciated. Thanks. Joana * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: st: Fixed Effects estimation with time-invariant variables***From:*David Jacobs <[email protected]>

**Re: st: Fixed Effects estimation with time-invariant variables***From:*"ALICE DOBSON" <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**st: data manipulation: pairs of variables** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: [Stata 8 for Mac] Dragging Do-Files to Stata Icon** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Fixed Effects estimation with time-invariant variables** - Next by thread:
**st: trend** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |