Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: diagt and accuracy

From   Ron´┐Żn Conroy <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: diagt and accuracy
Date   Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:23:36 +0100

[email protected] wrote:

Originally I wanted to have ROC area (as calculated in -diagt-), but I was
told that with a dichotomous test ROC area wasn't relevant, ie, I didn't
have different cutpoints at which to operate the test. That's when she
mentioned accuracy defined with prevalence.

In fact, ROC area doesn't account for prevalence either...

The ROC area is still useful, because it is the Mann Whitney statistic - the probability that if a person with and a person without the condition are taken at random, the person with the condition will have the higher score. In clinical trials, it becomes the probability that a person on the superior treatment will have a superior response. Both are very useful clinical information.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this
email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority,
states them to be the views of The Royal College Of Surgeons in Ireland.


* For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index