[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Cameron Hooper <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
Re: st: Programming question |

Date |
Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:36:15 -0500 |

Hi

I agree that rollreg is probably the best solution. I started with Kit Baum's routine and just got to wondering if I could produce a quick and dirty solution that would work for my data. Since I knew nothing about programming in Stata, the dirty aspect has been realized but not the quick! Still, its been a good learning exercise and thanks to the replies I've received from people on this list I've learnt a lot in a short period of time.

Cheers,

Cameron

Nick Cox wrote:

Frankly, I think you will be better off starting with -rollreg-, notwithstanding the apparent quirk that Kit Baum is currently looking at.--

For example, your draft code

assumes that your identifiers are all present within a sequence;

calculates the SD of residuals even though that is a result left behind by -regress-;

wires in your own particular variable names;

makes presumptions about the sort order of observations.

None of these is necessarily fatal, but the whole means that this program may not bear very much pressure.

Rolling regressions is a little tricky as a Stata programming problem. Even if it weren't it would make sense to start from Kit's program as the best that's visible in Stataland.

Nick [email protected]

Cameron Hooper

David Kantor wrote:find that youAt 12:00 PM 3/4/2005 -0500, Cameron Hooper wrote:A novice programming question.If you tell us more about what you want to do, then we may

forvalues i = 1(1)<number of companies> {

for values j = 1(1)<number of observations for company `i'> {

<do stuff>

}

}

really don't need to do all that explicit looping.Experience has shown

David Harrison suggested:that it is very rare that you really need such looping.

summ id, meanonly

forvalues i = 1/`r(max)' {

qui count if id==`i'

forvalues j = 1/`r(N)' {

<do stuff>

}

}

Which does what I asked for (thanks David). However my ultimate goal is more complex than my original question suggested and upon using David's code I've seen a new difficulty. (I'm learning as I go!) Here is my full problem.

I want to estimate rolling regressions on a firm by firm basis. Then for each regression I want to find the standard deviation of the residuals. Something like:

program rstdres

version 8.0

syntax varlist , window(int) gen(string)

generate `gen' = .

tempvar resid

sum id, meanonly

quietly{

for values i = 1/'r(max)' {

count if id==`i'

while `b' < `r(N)' {

regress y x in `a'/`b' if id == `i' /// See comment below

cap drop `resid'

predict `resid' if e(sample), resid

summarize `resid'

replace `gen' = r(sd) in `b'

local a = `a' + 1

local b = `b' + 1

}

}}

My problem now is getting `a' and `b'. At the moment that are just placeholders in the code. They represent the rolling window. I don't know how to set them properly. Here is how they should behave:

id x y

1 1 5

1 2 6

1 4 2

2 2 5

2 8 9

2 6 1

2 2 4

2 4 9

When id == 2 I and `window' = 3 then I want a and b to be:

Iteration

1 a = 4 b = 6

2 a = 5 b = 7

3 a = 6 b = 8

Can you suggest how to achieve this. Or am I approaching the entire problem in the wrong way?

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

Cameron Hooper <[email protected]>

Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan

701 Tappan St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109

phone: 734-615-4178 fax: 734-936-0282

Public Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=0xFCCF8C91

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: Rolling your own [was: Programming question]***From:*"Scott Merryman" <[email protected]>

**References**:**RE: st: Programming question***From:*"Nick Cox" <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Interpreting the output** - Next by Date:
**st: Setting a missing value in a generic context** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: Programming question** - Next by thread:
**st: Rolling your own [was: Programming question]** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |