Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: reg3

From   PATGIRI Rajdeep <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   RE: st: reg3
Date   Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:48:15 +0100

Title: RE: st: reg3

Following up from my previous email about "reg3", is there any way to check for overidentifying restrictions after reg3?  The "overid" module that I know of is available only after ivreg and ivreg2 estimations.

And thanks a lot to those people who replied to my previous email.

Best regards,

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Schaffer [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 5:01 PM
To: [email protected]; PATGIRI Rajdeep
Cc: '[email protected]'
Subject: Re: st: reg3 with Probit

Quoting PATGIRI Rajdeep <[email protected]>:

Omar Keshk's -cdsimeq- sounds like it might do what you want.  The alternative is to estimate equation-by-equation, e.g., -ivprob- for your endogenous dependent variable and -ivreg- (or -ivreg2-) for the others.

Hope this helps.


> Hello,
> I am trying to run a system of simultaneous equations, but one of the
> regression equation is a binary dependent variable model, i.e. Probit. 
> Is it possible in any way to incorporate into the "reg3" module of
> Stata?  I am currently generating the predicted probabilities from the
> probit model first, and then replacing this as dependent variable in
> the probit model and
> run a least square.  But I think the standard errors in here are not
> exactly reliable.
> Thanks for any input.
> Best regards,
> Rajdeep

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index