Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: Xtregar interpretation

From   Jeffrey Simons <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: Xtregar interpretation
Date   Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:34:14 -0500

What does it signify if sigma_u (and thus theta and rho_fov) equal 0 in a
random effects xtregar model? In looking at the formula, it seems that this
indicates that the individual level constant is zero. I am unclear what this
signifies from an interpretive (diagnostic) standpoint regarding the model I
am trying to run. This seems to occur as I increase the complexity of the
model and I was wondering if this suggests that some of the terms are
inappropriate to include.

Input will be most appreciated.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index