[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Kit Baum <[email protected]> |

To |
"Nick Cox" <[email protected]> |

Subject |
st: Re: mvsumm and missing obs |

Date |
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:38:27 -0400 |

I agree; I'm not thrilled about the notion of adding this flexibility to mvsumm. One would then have to compute, for each statistic and each point in time, the number of data points that went into it, and would have to be able to specify what a minimum amount of information might be to calculate anything at all. Neither of those are technically daunting, but the concept of a moving statistic based upon a variable amount of information should be treated with extreme caution (e.g. say that I am calculating 24-month averages, but for some periods only my minimum of 4 data points are available. The standard errors of those means would vary radically). Users are free to create 'mvsumm2', 'mvsumm3', etc. but I am not keen on this flexibility for mvsumm or mvcorr.

A solution not involving programming would be to generate, e.g., mvsumm for 5 obs. as one variable, mvsumm for 4 as another, and mvsumm for 3 as a third, and then use simple logic to define your result as that based on the largest sample for which the statistic is non-missing (taking 3 as the minimum). Imagine that stat5, stat4, stat3 in the table are mvsumm results for 5, 4 and 3 obs respectively. Then

. g mystat = cond(stat5<.,stat5,cond(stat4<.,stat4,stat3))

. l

+--------------------------------+

| stat3 stat4 stat5 mystat |

|--------------------------------|

1. | 10 16 . 16 |

2. | 11 . . 11 |

3. | 12 13 14 14 |

+--------------------------------+

Kit

On Aug 10, 2004, at 12:18 PM, Nick Cox wrote:

I think you need to clone -mvsumm- and get your clone, called something else, to do what you want. It's not difficult, but speaking as a co-author of -mvsumm- you don't have my support in this aim. Insisting on complete windows is, I suggest, to be regarded as a small feature in -mvsumm-. You can nobble the code if you wish, but that is your responsibility. Kit Baum may or may not agree with me on this. Nick [email protected] [email protected]I have a similar question to Adrian's about -mvsumm-. Unfortunately, the proposed solution (using -tssmooth-) doesn't work as I am interested in moving variances, not moving averages. How can I get create a variable that contains the variance of the five preceding observations in a panel data set, even if one or two of the those preceding observations are missing? And how can I specify the minimum number of non-missing observations within the window?

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: RE: mvsumm and missing obs***From:*"Nick Cox" <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: mvsumm and missing obs** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: How to estimate the sum of two estimators** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: mvsumm and missing obs** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |