Thanks Nicholas. In fact I am doing the xtabond. Any ideas how to load
the xtabond2 routine in stata?
Thanks for your help, cheers.
Kostas
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Clive
Nicholas
Sent: 04 August 2004 11:12
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: The Sargan test in -xtabond(2)-
Kostas Drakos wrote:
> I am estimating a dynamic panel using the GMM Arellano-Bond routine.
> It's proved impossible so far to find an instrument set that will
> satisfy the Sargan test. How crucial is the significance of the Sargan
> test?
First of all, use a germane subject heading!
Second of all, you didn't say whether you're using -xtabond- or
-xtabond2-. I know this is a bit naughty to say, but if one doesn't give
you the 'right' Sargan test statistic, why not try the other? (It is, of
course, Hansen's J in -xtabond2-.)
I've had this trouble myself recently, but managed to be creative with
the
instruments I used to satisfy the J test. From what I've learned off
others, this test is pretty crucial as it provides a strong indication
that the instruments you're using are invalid.
CLIVE NICHOLAS |t: 0(044)191 222 5969
Politics |e: [email protected]
Newcastle University |http://www.ncl.ac.uk/geps
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
