[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Mike Lacy <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
st: Problem in modifying built-in ktau.ado code (for Kendall's tau) |

Date |
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 17:44:19 -0700 |

Greetings,

I need to calculate Kendall's tau as efficiently as possible on two continuous variables for each repetition in a large set of bootstrap experiments. Calculating Kendall's tau is slow, being of order (N^2)/2. My estimate is that using the built-in ktau.ado command, which is the fastest command to obtain Kendall's tau in Stata, the bootstrap experiments will take at least 10-15 days of dedicated time on a fast Wintel machine.

Consequently, I am trying to modify the code of the ktau.ado into my own version. In the middle of the loop in ktau.ado, I discovered there is a call to the sign() function, which accounts for about 70% of the execution time of ktau.ado. My idea was to avoid the overhead of a function call by replacing the sign() function with an equivalent set of If statements. So, I calculate my own "mysign" function value using Ifs and use it in place of sign() in the original code. However, I am not getting the right results, as I explain below after presenting the two relevant code fragments:

* Built-in ktau.ado code goes like this:

* View with a about a 10 pt nonproportional font

* `x' and `y' reference the two variables

* passed to the ktau command

gen double `work' = 0

scalar `k' = 2

while (`k' <= `N') {

local kk = `k' - 1

#delimit ;

replace `work' = `work'

+ sign((`x' - `x'[`k'])*(`y' - `y'[`k'])) /* slow */

in 1/`kk' ;

#delimit cr

scalar `k' = `k' + 1

}

Below is what I tried to do. And yes, I know that

if/else would be faster but I was trying to simplify

my code as much as possible while trying to track down

my error.

* My code, with differences indicated

gen double `work' = 0

scalar `k' = 2

while (`k' <= `N') {

local kk = `k' - 1

* Calc "mysign" as a substitute for the sign() function

* The rest of the code is as untouched as possible

scalar pairprod = (`x' - `x'[`k'])*(`y' - `y'[`k']) in 1/`kk'

if (pairprod < 0) {scalar mysign = -1}

if (pairprod > 0) {scalar mysign = 1}

if (pairprod == 0) {scalar mysign = 0}

if (pairprod == .) {scalar mysign = .}

*

#delimit ;

replace `work' = `work'

+ mysign

/* + sign((`x' - `x'[`k'])*(`y' - `y'[`k'])) Removed */

in 1/`kk' ;

#delimit cr

scalar `k' = `k' + 1

}

Problem: I have checked the values of "mysign" vs. sign{) and they are the same for each iteration of the loop. However, at the end of the while loop, the values in the variable `work' are not what they should be, so I presume the problem is with what I have done with the "replace" command. Could someone offer some suggestion?

Thanks,

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Mike Lacy

Fort Collins CO USA

(970) 491-6721 office

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: Re: Problem in modifying built-in ktau.ado code (for Kendall's tau)***From:*Roger Newson <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Re: RE: Goldfeldt-Quant versus -hettest-** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: Problem in modifying built-in ktau.ado code (for Kendall's tau)** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: Goldfeldt-Quant versus -hettest-** - Next by thread:
**st: Re: Problem in modifying built-in ktau.ado code (for Kendall's tau)** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |