From | "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |
To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | st: RE: Question Regarding _result() |
Date | Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:23:51 -0000 |
_result() used to be the way for official commands to leave stuff behind. Unless you have access to old manuals, I recommend reverse-engineering in this way: <command> . disp_res (This shows what is available in _result().) . ret li (This shows what is available in r() stuff.) . eret li (This shows what is available in e() stuff.)
© Copyright 1996–2022 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |