[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Louise Linsell" <[email protected]> |

To |
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]> |

Subject |
st: RE: Re: Analysis of binary cluster data with missingvalues |

Date |
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:18:33 +0000 |

To fill you in further, the problem is this: I have a sample of 1000 people, that is, 2000 hips and 2000 knees. A proportion of each are replaced, 400 replaced hips and 600 replaced knees. I wish to test for the difference between the proportion of replaced hips and replaced knees, or calculate an odds ratio with a confidence interval, using a method that deals with the lack of independence between joints. Each row of the dataset represents a hip and a knee for each person, but they are not paired in any order, i.e. within person, the right hip could appear on the same line as the left knee or the right knee, and this is why it matters that STATA drops the whole line of observations when it drops a missing value in the analysis. Louise >>> [email protected] 13/11/2003 11:39:07 >>> I assume "row" means "leg" or "limb". I don't think this is a Stata issue, as Stata's behaviour appears correct given the data and what you ask of it. Please explain why you think your by-hand analysis is correct. I don't think you can collapse the table in this way. A test of that is that if you reverse the table you cannot recover even a subset of the data correctly, as you do not have complete data on 6 limbs. Rather, you have complete data on 5 limbs only, as Stata is telling you. Nick [email protected] Louise Linsell > I have a dataset that looks something like this - each person has > observations on 2 hips and 2 knees and I wish to calcuate > the odds ratio > of hips to knees, taking account of the clustering within > person using > robust standard errors. > > id hip knee row > 1 1 0 1 > 1 1 0 2 (1=replaced, 2=not replaced) > 2 . 1 3 > 2 0 1 4 > 3 1 0 5 > 3 0 . 6 > 4 1 0 7 > 4 . . 8 > > I have tried all of the following commands > > logistic hip knee, cluster(id) > xtlogit hip knee, i(id) or > svymean hip, by(knee) > > but all of them drop any record (line) with a missing value > (.), so in > the above dataset, rows 3, 6 and 8 would be dropped, > despite there being > a non-missing observation in the other group that should be > included in > the analysis. This gives incorrect estimates for the odds > ratio when you > calculate them by hand from the equivalent 2x2 table. e.g from the > above example, if I was calculating the OR by hand I would get > > yes (1) no (0) > > hips 4 2 > > knees 2 4 > > OR = (4X4)/(2X2) = 4 > > However if all the rows with the missing values are dropped, you get > > yes (1) no (0) > > hips 4 1 > > knees 1 4 > > OR = (4X4)/(1X1) = 16 > > Any ideas or suggestions on how to calculate the correct > odds ratio and > robust s.e. would be much appreciated. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**st: Re: Cox/Jenkins gammafit package** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Merge data** - Previous by thread:
**st: Re: Cox/Jenkins gammafit package** - Next by thread:
**st: Probit estimation sing stata** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |