Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: wald test and ivreg

From   "Mark Schaffer" <>
Subject   Re: st: wald test and ivreg
Date   Tue, 4 Nov 2003 19:06:13 -0000


Subject:        	st: wald test and ivreg
Date sent:      	Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:01:40 -0000
From:           	"Amess, Dr K.M." <>
To:             	<>
Send reply to:

> Dear all,
> I am using the -ivreg- command with the "robust cluster(i) small"
> options. Because I have used the small option t-stasticis are
> specified that are robust to general forms of heteroscedasticity and
> within correlation. Additionally, the -test- command invokes an F-test
> of my specified restrictions.
> Would it be better to use a Wald test of restrictions

I'm not sure I understand the issue.  According to -help test-,

"test and testparm perform Wald tests."

so you are already using a Wald test.

> I want to test
> as the F-test is not valid in the presence of heteroscedasticity or is
> the F-test robust in the same way as the t-statistic is robust due to
> robust standard errors being used?

If you estimate with -robust-, then the estimated var-cov matrix is 
robust, and hence -test- will give you a heteroskedasticity-robust 
(Wald) test stat.


> Is there a way of telling Stata to conduct a Wald test even when the
> default is to conduct an F-test after the 'small' option is used in
> the previously estimated model?
> Thanks for help in advance.
> Kevin
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *
> *
> *

Prof. Mark E. Schaffer
Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation
Department of Economics
School of Management & Languages
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS  UK
44-131-451-3494 direct
44-131-451-3008 fax
44-131-451-3485 CERT administrator
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2022 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index