Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: statalist-digest V4 #970

From   "Paul Seed" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: statalist-digest V4 #970
Date   Thu, 8 Aug 2002 13:42:51 +0100

Many thanks to Gary for this.  Changing the saved result to a scalar
did indeed take care of the problem.

Although the term "control" is used, this is not a matched case-control
study, rather a comparison of two groups of pregnant women, (with & without
APS).  An unpaied t-test (or non-parametric equivalent) is entirely

Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 10:47:41 -0700
From: Gary Longton <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: st: Problems with -bs- command

Paul Seed wrote:

> I am interested in a bootstrapped confidence interval for the
> difference between two means, and to save time
> wish to work out the means using -summ, meanonly-.
> I have written a Stata program to do this, which runs perfectly well
> on it's own.  However, when trying to get -bs- to work out the confidence
> intervals, I get an unexplained error message.
> Any thoughts on wher ethe problem lies, greatly appreciated.

the program:

> cap prog drop myprog
> prog define myprog, rclass
> 	summ centile if aps, mean
> 	di "r(mean) = " r(mean)
> 	local m1 = r(mean)
> 	return local m1 = r(mean)
> 	summ centile if control, mean
> 	return local m2 = r(mean)
> 	return local m2_m1 = `m1' - r(mean)
> end myprog

called with -bs-

> 	set seed 35435141
> 	bs "myprog" "r(m1)", reps(50)


 > 	bs "myprog" "r(m1) r(m2) r(m2_m1)", reps(50)

and output:

> . * Now use it for bootstrap"
> .         set seed 35435141
> .         bs "myprog" "r(m1) r(m2) r(m2_m1)", reps(50)
> command:     myprog
> statistics:  r(m1) r(m2) r(m2_m1)
> error in statistic: r(m1)
> r(198);

I believe the -bs- command is complaining about the use of macro results
in the expression list, i.e. "r(m1)"

It should work if these are instead scalar results.  Eg. in the program
- -myprog-, replace

    return local m1 = r(mean)


    return scalar m1 = r(mean)

and likewise for m2, and m2_m1
and it should work.

However, am wondering whether this type of sampling is best for your design?
The command

 > 	summ centile if control, mean

hints that this might be a case-control design?, in which case you might
want to
be sampling separately from cases and controls? which can be done, but not
- -bs-.

- - Gary

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index