Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: RE: RE: Re: Panel data manipulation question (2)


From   "Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: RE: RE: Re: Panel data manipulation question (2)
Date   Tue, 16 Jul 2002 18:18:28 +0100

"are echoed where they belong" is the wrong way to explain it. 
"appear where they belong" is a bit better. 

Nick 
[email protected] 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Nick Cox
> Sent: 16 July 2002 17:48
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: RE: RE: Re: Panel data manipulation question
> 
> 
> Taggert J Brooks replied to Scott Merryman and myself:
> >
> > This is indeed a neat little solution, but It won't work 
> for me as I
> > have an unbalanced panel...I have a different number of
> > years for each
> > country.  However now that I think about it the main data
> > I'll need for
> > this paper is consistent across countries so I could
> > balance it, then
> > run your suggestion.
> >
> 
> Scott's approach, as generalised mildly by me,
> will still work with unbalanced panels,
> I believe, as I asserted in my reply. The only
> and necessary consequence is that
> missing values are echoed where they belong.
> 
> Nick
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index