Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Interpreting confidence interval of log of variance, xtlogit

From   Maarten Buis <>
Subject   Re: st: Interpreting confidence interval of log of variance, xtlogit
Date   Fri, 7 Dec 2012 09:43:58 +0100

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Therese Saltkjel wrote:
> I have performed a two level random intercept logit model; the xtlogit procedure in STATA (12.0), where individuals are nested within countries. The provided likelihood ratio test indicate that the rho is statistically significant, supporting the use of a multilevel model. However the log of variance, Insig2u in the output, is not significant as the confidence interval includes zero. I need help to interpret these results. In addition I need a general advice on what to report in a table; the log of variance or standard deviation of random intercept (sigma_u in the output)?

When testing you need to first think about what the null hypothesis
is, and whether that is a statement you want to test. If  you test
whether the log(variance) = 0, you are testing whether the variance =
1. Now it is up to you to decide whether that is meaningful.

Same is true with what you want to report. Remember that a statistical
model is just there to summarize the data. The stuff you report is
only there because it means something. So you need to decide which
story you want to tell, and which coefficients help you tell that
story. I would typically prefer the standard deviations, but others
prefer the variances and for good reasons. I don't know anyone who
prefers the log(variances), but I don't know everybody.

Hope this helps,

Maarten L. Buis
Reichpietschufer 50
10785 Berlin

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index