Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Meulemann Max" <mmeulemann@ethz.ch> |

To |
"statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
AW: AW: st: prgen option quadratic term |

Date |
Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:47:27 +0000 |

I also did the regressions with centered variables, but the picture essentially stays the same. y is an assement of importance on a certain burden sharing rule, values are not important, mod. imp, important, very imp. I am also getting the feeling that the result is driven by outliers in capitagdp. Thx for the help, I should be able to interpret it myself, just seemed wired for me personally that there would be a quadratic term and a turning point on that issue im looking at. ________________________________________ Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu]" im Auftrag von "Daniel Feenberg [feenberg@nber.org] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2012 12:39 An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Betreff: Re: AW: st: prgen option quadratic term > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Meulemann Max <mmeulemann@ethz.ch> wrote: >> thx, the margins and marginsplot function helped a lot. >> >> Anyways anybody got a idea how I am to interpret my data here: I find a >> negativ linear term for capitagdp, but if i include a quadratic gdp >> term, that one turns out to be positiv and significant with a lrtest. If you rerun your regression, but replace gpd*^2 with the square of gdp less mean gdp, then you have basically the same model and standard errors, but the coefficient on the squared term will have no influence on the dependent variable at the mean gdp. So you have an easy interpretation of the linear term - it is the effect at the mean gdp. The sign of the quadratic coeficient then tells you if the effect grows or shrinks for gdp larger or smaller than the mean and it is easy to see how intense that effect will be. The other coeficients will be unaffected. dan feenberg NBER * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: prgen option quadratic term***From:*"Meulemann Max" <mmeulemann@ethz.ch>

**Re: st: prgen option quadratic term***From:*Richard Goldstein <richgold@ix.netcom.com>

**AW: st: prgen option quadratic term***From:*"Meulemann Max" <mmeulemann@ethz.ch>

**Re: AW: st: prgen option quadratic term***From:*Richard Goldstein <richgold@ix.netcom.com>

**Re: AW: st: prgen option quadratic term***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

**AW: AW: st: prgen option quadratic term***From:*"Meulemann Max" <mmeulemann@ethz.ch>

**Re: AW: st: prgen option quadratic term***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**Re: AW: st: prgen option quadratic term***From:*Daniel Feenberg <feenberg@nber.org>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Problems estimating margins with factor variables in cmp** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: xtlogit, margins** - Previous by thread:
**Re: AW: st: prgen option quadratic term** - Next by thread:
**st: Several questions regarding xtprobit and margins command** - Index(es):