Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AW: st: prgen option quadratic term


From   Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: AW: st: prgen option quadratic term
Date   Tue, 6 Nov 2012 17:10:33 +0100

Also see: <http://www.maartenbuis.nl/wp/inter_quadr/inter_quadr.html>

-- Maarten

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Richard Goldstein
<richgold@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> I am not familiar with prgen
>
> sounds like you want the -margins- command?
>
> On 11/6/12 10:24 AM, Meulemann Max wrote:
>> I d like to get the predicted probabilites as my contionus predicator changes keeping fixed the other ones as it is done in -prgen- only with a quadratic term of that predicator. I do not just want the predicted probabilites.
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu]&quot; im Auftrag von &quot;Richard Goldstein [richgold@ix.netcom.com]
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. November 2012 16:10
>> An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
>> Betreff: Re: st: prgen option quadratic term
>>
>> I don't understand; why don't you start by telling us what is wrong with
>> just using -predict- after your -ologit-? for help on this, start with
>> -h ologit-, then click on "also see" and click on "ologit postestimation"
>>
>> Rich
>>
>> On 11/6/12 10:07 AM, Meulemann Max wrote:
>>> I would like to calculate predicted probabilities in an ordinal model, ologit or oprobit. I am using a continous quadratic term, which makes calculating the predicted probablities more cumbesome. I am using stata 12
>>>
>>> I found an old entry in the statalist archive that  proposed oprobpr which does work. I was wondering if another package has been written since 2005.
>>>
>>> oprobpr does work, but some of it its features are a bit irritating like how it saves the predicted probailites in another dataset and so on. The nicest way would be to change prgen and its familiar option in a way that the same feature that works for oprobpr would work for prgen.
>>>
>>> the level options allows oproppr to vary an otherwise fixed covariate with a squared term, which is not possible for the x option of prgen.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Max
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



-- 
---------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
WZB
Reichpietschufer 50
10785 Berlin
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
---------------------------------

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index