Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Missingness


From   "Justina Fischer" <JAVFischer@gmx.de>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Missingness
Date   Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:37:44 +0200

the 'missing variable' indicator was rejected as collinear because you probably did not recode the underlying categorical variable. Then the indicator variable is indeed 100% collinear with the missings in your original categorical variable. 


Justina 




-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:07:22 +0100
> Von: Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>
> An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> Betreff: Re: st: Missingness

> Your strategy isn't clear. Regardless of whether or how you use an
> extra missingness variable, how do you expect Stata to treat the
> missing values in the variables you already have?  Also, are the
> ordinal predictors being treated as ordinal? Is the response ordinal
> and does it include missing values too? One way forward is to treat
> "missing" as just another category with its own code, but that would
> seem to oblige you to treat such variables as nominal (in practice as
> equivalent indicator variables) -- unless somehow you know that
> "missing" always means "very big" or "very small" or "zero" and so can
> be placed or one end or within the order.
> 
> Nick
> 
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Brendan Churchill
> <Brendan.Churchill@utas.edu.au> wrote:
> 
> > I am using some ordinal variables, which have some numeric missing
> values, in a multilevel model. In some previous research, I have seen
> researchers include a 'Missing' independent variable in their model to account for
> some of the 'missingness' - or rather to control for the missing values, but
> I don't quite understand how to do it in Stata or even if that's a good way
> to do it. I've tried to make a binary variable in which the missing values
> are coded 1 and the rest of the values are coded 0 but the model rejects
> this because it's collinear.
> >
> > Is this how you do it? Or is there a variable for the entire data set
> that is created to account for all missing variables?
> >
> > I'd great appreciate any advice or assistance anyone out there could
> provide
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

-- 
Justina AV Fischer, PhD
COFIT Fellow
World Trade Institute
University of Bern

homepage: http://www.justinaavfischer.de/
e-mail: javfischer@gmx.de. justina.fischer@wti.org
papers: http://ideas.repec.org/e/pfi55.html


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index