Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: violating normality assumption for tobit


From   Austin Nichols <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: violating normality assumption for tobit
Date   Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:43:26 -0500

Raymond Lim <[email protected]>:
Meaning, where an ordered probit or ordered logit is clearly preferred.
help ologit

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> This seems to confuse marginal and conditional distribution. That
> aside, the way forward here is surely to simulate using what you know
> to see how -tobit- performs in these non-standard conditions.
>
> Nick
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Raymond Lim <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I am running a tobit and normality is a crucial assumption. However,
>> my dependent variable follows a uniform distribution. I'm looking at
>> award placement: 1st place, 2nd place, ... 10th place. I collect data
>> from many competitions and always have 10 places. How can I address
>> the fact that my dependent variable will never be normal even if N
>> goes to infinity?
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index