Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

re: Re: st: MIXLOGIT: marginal effects

From   Christopher Baum <>
To   "" <>
Subject   re: Re: st: MIXLOGIT: marginal effects
Date   Thu, 9 Feb 2012 09:17:11 -0500

Brendan said

To play devil's advocate, let me mention Mood (2010), who argues that
where unobserved heterogeneity makes it invalid to compare log-odds
estimates sizes across samples, the LPM estimate can be more consistent.

To be pedantic (hey--it's my day job): for an econometrician, consistency is analogous to pregnancy:
you are or you aren't. You often see discussions of relative efficiency, but I've never heard anyone
argue for relative consistency.


Kit Baum   |   Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin   |
                             An Introduction to Stata Programming  |
  An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata  |

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index