Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: multinomial multilevel analysis in Stata


From   Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   "'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: multinomial multilevel analysis in Stata
Date   Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:06:41 +0100

This is one of the most frequent questions on this list. There are many answers, of which my favourite is to use -poisson- or -glm, link(log)- i.e. use a link function that indulges zeros in the data, not a transformation. However, if the zeros arise from some quite distinct process, you may need something more complicated. 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Rosie Chen
Sent: 15 October 2011 15:18
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: st: multinomial multilevel analysis in Stata

Thank you, Cam. I will read the articles mentioned below. What would you suggest for dealing with zero values when log transforming data? 


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index