Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Joerg Luedicke <joerg.luedicke@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Predicted probability after xtlogit with i option |

Date |
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:59:04 -0400 |

I am not 100% sure if its doable with -xtlogit-, but you could use -xtmelogit- for which the default prediction (-mu-) takes the random effect into account (see -help xtmelogit postestimation-). (Using the option -fixedonly- with -predict- after -xtmelogit- should replicate your predictions from -xtlogit-). J. On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Urmi Bhattacharya <ub3@indiana.edu> wrote: > Hello Statalisters, > > I am running the following xtlogit model > > xtlogit school_left childage i.childfemale i.urban i.scstobc > i.casteother i.dadp i.dadm i.momp i.momm wagep wage5 wage8 wage9 distp > distm disth percapcons durat1 durat2 durat3 durat4 durat5 durat6 > durat7 durat8 durat9 durat10 durat11, nocons nolog i(childcaseid) > > After estimation, I need to find the predicted probability for each individual. > > I do the following: > > predict prob,pu0 > > The help file says that this calculation assumes that the random > effect is 0. My question is if it would be possible to find the > predicated probability not assuming that? Or is this the best I can > do. > > Thanks > > Urmi Bhattacharya > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Predicted probability after xtlogit with i option***From:*Urmi Bhattacharya <ub3@indiana.edu>

**References**:**st: Predicted probability after xtlogit with i option***From:*Urmi Bhattacharya <ub3@indiana.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Thread-Index: Acw2hSNoKEe+GALWTv+Qdt/CONjYXg==** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: RE: Re: rolling standard deviation [was: ""]** - Previous by thread:
**st: Predicted probability after xtlogit with i option** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Predicted probability after xtlogit with i option** - Index(es):