Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Combining inteff, margeff and outreg2 |

Date |
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:44:54 +0200 |

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Florian Seliger wrote: > I'm using the margeff and outreg2 command after several probit models: <snip> > Is there any way to display the "inteff" marginal effect with outreg2, whereas the other marginal effects are still calculated with margeff? Not really. This has nothing to do with either -inteff- or -outreg2- but with the thing you are trying to describe. If you use -inteff- correctly the result will be a graph showing for each individual its marginal effect for the interaction term. You will most likely see that this marginal effect is significantly positive for some, significantly negative for others and non-significant for the rest. computing an average marginal effect can thus not do that variation justice, so we cannot summarize these marginal effects in one number, so we cannot export it to -outreg2-. Remember that marginal effects are like a linear model fitted on top of a non-linear model and models are simplifications of whatever they describe. Models (of models) are fine as long as they are useful, but at some point the thing they are describing becomes too complex for the model to be useful. This is what happens with marginal effects for interaction effects. I see two solutions: 1) If all you want to do is present marginal effects, than why not cut out the middle man and directly estimate a linear probability model? The probit model is in that case just an unnecessary step between your data and the results you are after. 2) If the linear probability model is not appropriate for your data than you can estimate logistic regression models and interpret the odds ratios, see: M.L. Buis (2010) "Stata tip 87: Interpretation of interactions in non-linear models", The Stata Journal, 10(2), pp. 305-308. Hope this helps, Maarten -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Combining inteff, margeff and outreg2***From:*"Florian Seliger" <florian.seliger@gmx.de>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: calculating latitude and longitude of nearby point** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Leamer's Extreme Bound Analysis and Fixed Effect** - Previous by thread:
**st: Combining inteff, margeff and outreg2** - Index(es):