Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Steven Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: pseudo R-squared |

Date |
Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:16:59 -0400 |

-- Gao, you must also make sure that all models are estimated on the same set of observations. That means you should exclude all observations with missing data for variables that appear in any of the models. Steve sjsamuels@gmail.com On Apr 3, 2011, at 6:48 PM, Richard Williams wrote: "When contrasting models, just make sure they really are nested, e.g. you don't want to be imposing different proportionality constraints in your different models while at the same time dropping or adding variables." At 04:15 PM 4/3/2011, Gao Liu wrote: > Thanks, Nick. Right, it should be gologit2. So it is McFadden's Pseudo R^2. > > Can I simply use the difference of the pseudo's R^2 of model with the > focal variable and that without to explain the increased explanatory > power? pseudo-R2 (with the variable)-pseudo-R2 (without the > variable)=(L1(with)-L1(without))/L0. Can I use this result as the > increased explanatory power? Are there any other ways to answer the > question of "how much more likely is the predictor able to predict the > change of categorical dependent variable" > > Thanks very much for your explanation. First off, thanks to Nick for answering the first part of the Q. gologit2 uses the McFadden's Pseudo R^2, just like logit and ologit and assorted other Stata routines do. If somebody had a burning desire to calculate one of the other Pseudo R^2 measures it probably would not be too hard to do so. With regards to the 2nd part of the question, I think the most customary thing to do is either a Wald test of the variable in question or a LR chi-square contrast between the model that has the variable and the model that doesn't. So, if the variable of interest was education, you could do something like use "http://www.indiana.edu/~jslsoc/stata/spex_data/ordwarm2.dta";, clear gologit2 warm yr89 male white age prst ed test ed nestreg, lr: gologit2 warm (yr89 male white age prst) (ed) When contrasting models, just make sure they really are nested, e.g. you don't want to be imposing different proportionality constraints in your different models while at the same time dropping or adding variables. ------------------------------------------- Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463 HOME: (574)289-5227 EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: pseudo R-squared***From:*Gao Liu <gao.liu@gmail.com>

**Re: st: pseudo R-squared***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**Re: st: pseudo R-squared***From:*Gao Liu <gao.liu@gmail.com>

**Re: st: pseudo R-squared***From:*Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Re: Editing Commands in Review Window** - Next by Date:
**Re: Re: st: how keep row variables even if they are missing** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: pseudo R-squared** - Next by thread:
**st: Make and Stata** - Index(es):