Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Interaction terms


From   Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Interaction terms
Date   Mon, 4 Apr 2011 08:17:27 +0100

This is the third time of asking. You asked this question twice
before, on March 30 and March 31.

The Statalist FAQ gives advice on this situation at

http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/statalist.html#noanswer

specifically advising at most once _one_ repost, and generally
advising that you rethink a question no one evidently wants to answer.

In this case, what you want evidently isn't clear. -mprobit- by itself
gives standard errors of terms fitted, interaction or plain.
Interpretation ultimately comes down to the science or substance of
your problem, and there isn't a program to help much with that.

(-inteff- and -clarify- are user-written programs whose sources you do
not explain.)

Nick

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:52 AM, josephine gakii <jogakii@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I am using multinomial probit with an interaction term in
> it. I would like to compute standard errors for meaningful
> interpretation of my results that have an interaction term.
>
> I have tried using the -inteff- command in STATA but it seems to support only the binary logit and probit. i have also tried the CLARIFY command in STATA but it does not support multinomial probit
>
> Is there a command that can handle interaction terms in multinomial probit?
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index