Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: Interaction in logit


From   Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   RE: st: Interaction in logit
Date   Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:26:53 +0100 (BST)

--- On Wed, 27/10/10, Teemu.Kautonen@tse.fi wrote:
> Would it be appropriate to keep all interaction terms in
> the model at the same time, or would you recommend testing
> the interactions separately, i.e. keeping only one
> interaction term in the model when running inteff? Or would
> a completely different strategy be better for testing
> multiple group differences - something like a random
> coefficient model? 

In principle there is nothing wrong with any of these models
as long as they are appropriate for the specific situation you 
are researching, your theory, your data, etc., etc. So there 
realy is only one person that can answer that question, and 
that is the researcher.

Hope this helps,
Maarten

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------


      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index