Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Re: FORTRAN


From   SR Millis <aa3379@wayne.edu>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Re: FORTRAN
Date   Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:48:57 -0700 (PDT)

But you have not answered a question posted ealier by another Statalist member, viz.

"What is this "more complicated estimation" you need FORTRAN to do?"

Scott Millis



--- On Mon, 8/30/10, Stata SpecialEdition <stata.se@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Stata SpecialEdition <stata.se@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: st: Re: FORTRAN
> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> Date: Monday, August 30, 2010, 5:32 PM
> I do not know that much about the
> FORTRAN yet, but I do know that the
> language has been updated a lot since when you last used
> it. My
> supervisor told me that the FORTRAN 90 and FORTRAN 2003
> revisions are
> very significant and have features common to most modern
> languages. It
> optimizes extremely well which it is why it is often the
> language of
> choice for very numerically intensive applications. People
> who think
> FORTRAN is dead do not know what they are talking about (so
> I am
> told).
> 








*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index