Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Re: FORTRAN
From
SR Millis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Re: FORTRAN
Date
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:48:57 -0700 (PDT)
But you have not answered a question posted ealier by another Statalist member, viz.
"What is this "more complicated estimation" you need FORTRAN to do?"
Scott Millis
--- On Mon, 8/30/10, Stata SpecialEdition <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Stata SpecialEdition <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: st: Re: FORTRAN
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Monday, August 30, 2010, 5:32 PM
> I do not know that much about the
> FORTRAN yet, but I do know that the
> language has been updated a lot since when you last used
> it. My
> supervisor told me that the FORTRAN 90 and FORTRAN 2003
> revisions are
> very significant and have features common to most modern
> languages. It
> optimizes extremely well which it is why it is often the
> language of
> choice for very numerically intensive applications. People
> who think
> FORTRAN is dead do not know what they are talking about (so
> I am
> told).
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/