Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AW: st: Spss vs Stata

From   Ted Anagnoson <>
Subject   Re: AW: st: Spss vs Stata
Date   Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:17:37 -0700

I just updated several chapters of a textbook, with explicit instructions from the publisher to include more graphs (for today's modern students!!! - hahaha).....

The publisher's copyright office insisted that I needed credits for the graphs because they looked so professional - all done in Stata, with a few adjustments in the graphics editor....

Ted Anagnoson
Political Science
California State University, Los Angeles

At 01:52 AM 8/2/2010, you wrote:


To echo Maarten`s sentiment, I just finished my PhD as well, and have never
wanted to stray from Stata to do beautiful graphs. Then again, I did not
need 3D graphs...


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
[] Im Auftrag von Maarten buis
Gesendet: Montag, 2. August 2010 10:50
Betreff: Re: st: Spss vs Stata

--- On Mon, 2/8/10, E. Paul Wileyto wrote:
> My two cents.  Graphics is the
> only bad aspect of Stata, but SPSS is almost as rudimentary
> in graphics.  If you want publication quality graphics
> quickly, the only package to consider is SigmaPlot.

This surprises me. I just finished my dissertation, and did
almost all my graphs in Stata. I considered it flexible and
able to produce every graph I wanted in a reproducable way.
I guess I got used to the way Stata works, and thus I am
less likely to see disadvantages. Can you elobarate on what
can be done with SigmaPlot that can't be done in Stata (or
is harder in Stata)?

-- Maarten

Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen

*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index