Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Multiple imputation is increasing the sample size


From   weddings@stata.com (Wesley D. Eddings, StataCorp)
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Multiple imputation is increasing the sample size
Date   Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:13:00 -0500

Hassan Chawdhury <russellchy@yahoo.com> noticed that -mi impute mvn- added 
observations to his data:

> But a weird thing happened with the mi procedure. When I run any tabulate or
> summarize command after the imputation, I can see that it has added cases to 
> my sample size.

What Hassan has noticed is the intended behavior of -mi impute-.  When we use
either the mlong -mi- style or the flong style, -mi impute- will store the
imputations in memory as new observations.  (Hassan may use the -mi describe-
command to display his -mi- style.)

The -mi estimate- command does not support -tabulate- or -summarize-, but it
does support -proportion-, -mean-, and -ratio-.  Hassan may also use -mi xeq- to
execute a command on an individual imputation.

-- Wes                  
weddings@stata.com      
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index