Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: AW: Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...

From   "Seed, Paul" <>
From   Ronan Conroy <>
To   "" <>
Subject   RE: st: AW: Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...
Date   Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:18:14 +0100
Date   Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:05:24 +0100

>On 24 Meith 2010, at 18:37, Nick Winter wrote:

>> At the risk of provoking flames - can someone articulate the reason
>> *for* citing the statistical software used in a book or article,
>> especially in the case where only very standard statistical tools are
>> used?  We don't, for example, generally cite the word processor,
>> citation management software, and other computer tools used in the
>> course of our research....

>No potential for flames as far as I can see.

>As a reviewer I encourage the practice so that people know the  
>capabilities of software, and if they are undertaking a similar study,  
>they may be guided in their choice of software for analysis.

As a reviewer I once noticed that a particular article could 
be improved using a novel method made available through an article 
in SJ.  As the authors had declared that they had used Stata, 
I could recommend its use with fair confidence that I was not asking 
the impossible.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index