Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Quantile regression and weights

From   Austin Nichols <>
Subject   Re: st: Quantile regression and weights
Date   Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:48:53 -0400

Jacob Felson <> :
Don't pretend you have freq weights when you don't. You can manually
bootstrap by repeatedly resampling and estimating the qreg with
aweights, which works well in practice but takes a long time to run.
etc. on qreg,
and e.g.
on the "manual bootstrap" idea.

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Jacob Felson <> wrote:
> Hello,
> I am wondering whether there is any way to run quantile regression
> (qreg) with probability weights.  I understand that this cannot be
> done directly, but I wondered if a work-around solution was advisable.
>  (Namely, weighting the data beforehand.)  I tried to weight using the
> analytical weight feature, bur ran into convergence problems when
> trying to estimate a 0.1 quantile regression.  My dataset is a subset
> of about 600K cases from the 2008 Public Use Microsample (PUMS) from
> the US Census.  The weight I am trying to use is a probability weight
> and has a very large range.  What about using frequency weights with
> bootstrapped standard errors?

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index