Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Tiago V. Pereira" <tiago.pereira@mbe.bio.br> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
st: How to make a code faster - alternatives to egen var = concat(vars) ? |

Date |
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:51:54 +0300 (BRT) |

Dear statalisters, I am working on a stata code, and I need some advice. I have n categorical variables that assumes values equal to 0, 1 or 2. My objective is to summarize a continuous variable (say, age) by all possible combinations of these categorical variables. For example, suppose I have 5 categorical variables (x1, x2, x3, x4 and x5): sum age if x1==0&x2==0&x3==0&x4==0&x5==0 then sum age if x1==0&x2==0&x3==0&x4==0&x5==1 then sum age if x1==0&x2==0&x3==0&x4==0&x5==2 and so forth. What I am doing is the following: (1) I generate a string of the categorical variables egen combination = concat(x1 x2 x3 x4 x5) (2) convert them to numeric encode combination, gene (y) and loop over the values of the new variable y to summarize the continuous variable forvalues i = 1/`some_max_value' { sum age if y=`i' } This naïve solution works very well for small samples (_N<1000) and small number of categorical variables (5 to 7). But when I need investigate in a larger sample with a larger number of categorical variables, this code is highly inefficient (e.g. slow). Do you have any suggestions to make this procedure faster in larger data sets? Thanks in advance! Tiago * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: How to make a code faster - alternatives to egen var = concat(vars) ?***From:*Antoine Terracol <terracol@univ-paris1.fr>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: matching observations for merging** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: Meta analysis of studies with varying duration of follow-up** - Previous by thread:
**st: where STATA on MAC always complains that some variable already existed?** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: How to make a code faster - alternatives to egen var = concat(vars) ?** - Index(es):