Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: RE: RE: -graph bar- bargap option |

Date |
Tue, 25 May 2010 19:24:39 +0100 |

Use the graph editor. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Sue Sent: 25 May 2010 19:22 To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: Re: st: RE: RE: -graph bar- bargap option Sorry but can you be a little more specific about step 3? How would I edit out traces of -dummy- and what does it do? Thanks, Sue On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> wrote: > My second answer still seems pertinent to your problem. i.e. > > 1. > > gen dummy = 0 > > 2. > > graph bar (mean) pred_f2002 pred_f2005 dummy pred_c2002 pred_c2005, > over(ca_cat) > > 3. > > Edit out traces of -dummy-. > > The bottom line is that you can get exactly what you want if you re-program with -twoway bar-. > > Nick > n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk > > Sue > > Thanks for your input. The variable "ca_cat" actually goes from 1 to > 3, for low, medium and high. Is there yet another way to do this > because when I use the "dummy solution", it obviously places a gap of > the size of a bar, and I'd like that bar to be narrower (so that the 4 > bars are still closer to each other than between low, medium and high > categories, if that makes sense.). > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> wrote: > >> I probably misread this. But some loosely similar fooling, e.g. by >> creating a variable with mean 0 and inserting it between the other two >> variables, is in the same spirit. >> >> Nick >> n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk >> >> Nick Cox >> >> Yes, there is. >> >> We can't see your data, but your problem appears to be on all fours with >> >> >> graph bar (mean) a b c d, over(cat) >> >> where cat = 1,2,3,4. >> >> Now -generate- an extra variable. >> >> gen dummy = cat > 2 >> >> and add an extra option >> >> ... over(dummy) >> >> Now edit the graph to remove all traces of the second option, except the >> bigger space. >> >> (If you are using Stata 10, -update- to Stata 10.1. It's free.) >> >> Nick >> n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk >> >> Sue >> >> I'm using STATA 10 to generate the following bar graph: >> >> graph bar (mean) pred_f2002 pred_f2005 pred_c2002 pred_c2005, >> over(ca_cat) >> >> Is there a way to put a bigger gap between the second and the third >> bar (relative to the gap between the 1st and 2nd, and 3rd and 4th >> bar)? > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: -graph bar- bargap option***From:*Sue <likecats@gmail.com>

**st: RE: -graph bar- bargap option***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**st: RE: RE: -graph bar- bargap option***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**Re: st: RE: RE: -graph bar- bargap option***From:*Sue <likecats@gmail.com>

**RE: st: RE: RE: -graph bar- bargap option***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**Re: st: RE: RE: -graph bar- bargap option***From:*Sue <likecats@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: probit vs. logit** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: RE: RE: -graph bar- bargap option** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: RE: RE: -graph bar- bargap option** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: RE: RE: -graph bar- bargap option** - Index(es):