Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: RE: -graph bar- bargap option |

Date |
Tue, 25 May 2010 18:43:16 +0100 |

I probably misread this. But some loosely similar fooling, e.g. by creating a variable with mean 0 and inserting it between the other two variables, is in the same spirit. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Nick Cox Yes, there is. We can't see your data, but your problem appears to be on all fours with graph bar (mean) a b c d, over(cat) where cat = 1,2,3,4. Now -generate- an extra variable. gen dummy = cat > 2 and add an extra option ... over(dummy) Now edit the graph to remove all traces of the second option, except the bigger space. (If you are using Stata 10, -update- to Stata 10.1. It's free.) Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Sue I'm using STATA 10 to generate the following bar graph: graph bar (mean) pred_f2002 pred_f2005 pred_c2002 pred_c2005, over(ca_cat) Is there a way to put a bigger gap between the second and the third bar (relative to the gap between the 1st and 2nd, and 3rd and 4th bar)? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: RE: RE: -graph bar- bargap option***From:*Sue <likecats@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: -graph bar- bargap option***From:*Sue <likecats@gmail.com>

**st: RE: -graph bar- bargap option***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: -graph bar- bargap option** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: probit vs. logit** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: -graph bar- bargap option** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: RE: RE: -graph bar- bargap option** - Index(es):