Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Is it correct to use frequency weights?

From   Rafael Claro <>
Subject   Re: st: Is it correct to use frequency weights?
Date   Tue, 4 May 2010 17:56:02 -0300

Dear Nicolás,

According to your description sounds like you have sampling weights and not frequency weights (check for pweight in help file for weights). As you also mentioned having other stages in your sampling plan the “frequency weight” possibility is even more improbable. This is, probably, the reason why you are facing unexpected results.

Check the help file for “survey” and also “svyset” for further information. You should not have a hard time to get everything working.

Best regards,
Rafael Moreira Claro

Em 04/05/2010 16:14, Nicolás Rojas < > escreveu:
Hi everyone,
                         I am using a crime survey that apparently has
frequency weights. The instruction manual says that the variable
"weights"  describes how many people each observation represent in the
population. That coincides with the  description of frrequency
                      However, I am realizing that this is a two step
survey and therefore other variables (namely, strata variables) also
included in the survey play an important role. That would explain why
using frequency weights give results that are very bizzare ( t test of
90, evrything with three stars etc).
Should I use stata commands for complex survey or should I use another
replication method for computing the standard errors?
Does anyone knows literature specific about that subject?

Thank you very much,

Nicolás Rojas
Ponthifical Catholic University of Chile

*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index