Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
gjhxmu@sina.com |

To |
statalist<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: Re: re: st: Simple regression and Multiple regression? |

Date |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:18:30 +0800 |

Dear Kit, Thank you very much for your help, which make it clear to me:) Best regards, Rose. ----- Original Message ----- From: Kit Baum <baum@bc.edu> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: Re: re: st: Simple regression and Multiple regression? Date: 2010-3-15 21:36:23 On Mar 15, 2010, at 2:33 AM, Rose wrote: > What about the constant? Is there an existing relationship between simple regression and multiple regression? > > By the way, I found the standard errors of turn were not the same in "reg epsp epst" and "reg price mpg weight turn". Just a decimal difference which can be ignored? As the simple regression is a regression of residuals on residuals, both of which are meanzero, the constant is by definition zero, and its estimated value is very close to that. The difference in standard errors is purely a small-sample degrees of freedom adjustment. In the run below, you will see that suest -- which generates large-sample z-stats -- generates identical SEs. So does -regress-; in the run below, compare the SE of epst adjusted by the ratio of sqrt(72/70) and the SE of turn from multiple regression. They are identical. If you estimated both equations from a very large sample, they would be almost identical. 74 is not a very large sample in asymptotic terms. -------------------- sysuse auto,clear reg price mpg weight predict double epsp, r qui reg turn mpg weight predict double epst, r reg epsp epst est store fwl scalar s2 = _se["epst"] di %12.8f s2 * sqrt(72/70) // Frisch-Waugh-Lovell theorem says that the coefficient of turn // should be the same in multiple regression or in a regression // of price on turn, with the effects of other regressors partialled-off // from both // see Baum-Schaffer-Stillman, Stata Journal 2003, 2007 // re ivreg2 fwl() option reg price mpg weight turn est store multr scalar s1 = _se["turn"] di %12.8f s1 suest multr fwl test [multr_mean]turn = [fwl_mean]epst ---------------------- Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: correcting skewness of an indep variables** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: correcting skewness of an indep variables** - Previous by thread:
**Re: re: st: Simple regression and Multiple regression?** - Next by thread:
**st: Re: Asking about how to run nonlinear ML with STATA** - Index(es):