Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: RE: Interpretation of quadratic terms


From   Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.edu>
To   "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>, "'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: RE: Interpretation of quadratic terms
Date   Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:12:43 -0500

At 06:57 PM 3/8/2010, Lachenbruch, Peter wrote:
A couple of posts noted a) using residuals after logit or logistic gives you Pearson residuals (obs-expected)/sqrt(var), b) after glm you get observed -expected (and get the two straight lines).

Check out the postestimation stuff for logit and glm and you'll see what I mean. Also, try this on the auto data - e.g. predicting foreign.

If you mean the 2 straight lines, I show this on p. 4 of

http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/stats2/l81.pdf


-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME:   (574)289-5227
EMAIL:  Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu
WWW:    http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index