Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: RE: Interpretation of quadratic terms


From   Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.edu>
To   "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>, "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: RE: Interpretation of quadratic terms
Date   Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:36:12 -0500

At 05:22 PM 3/8/2010, Martin Weiss wrote:

<>

" I think that is why you don't even get the usual resid = y
- yhat as an option with the predict command after logit:"



How about the ones available after -glm-?

-glm- has more of a one size fits all approach. It doesn't have a lot of the customizations you see when using the more specific commands. There was a thread a long time ago about how after -logit- some residuals are computed "adjusted for number sharing covariate pattern" -- if that isn't the way you want to compute them you can use -glm- instead. But logit restricts you the way it does because the options listed are the ones deemed more statistically sound.


-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME:   (574)289-5227
EMAIL:  Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu
WWW:    http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index