Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: R for Stata Users |

Date |
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:40:05 -0600 |

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Cohen, Elan <cohened@upmc.edu> wrote: > > knowledge stops. I am still lost at the differences between > > lists, data > > frames, matrices and whatever other objects R might have > > http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-intro.html#Arrays-and-matrices > http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-intro.html#Lists-and-data-frames > Well, as pretty much of R documentation, it gives the minimal amount of information. That's how you write research papers when the manuscript submission guidelines give the limits on the number of pages: "We used Heckman model" assuming everybody is familiar with it. If NJC sees anything like that on statalist, he reminds that it is nice to give the reference, at the very least. And if you really want to have your problem or approach explained, so that your question really gets answered, you give an extensive description of where each thing is going: "I have the dependent variable of main interest that is informatively missing in a good number of observations. I believe that the reason why it is missing is explained by the following variables. So I build a bivariate normal model to explain both the dependent variable and the missing indicator simultaneously". Sure, R documentations is technically correct, but it would make my life so much easier if it were about "Why" as much as about "How"... and had a section "You would want to use a list for... you would want to use a data frame for..." etc. If you know the thing already, it is easy to figure out how it is implemented based on the docs. But if you don't know how it is called, you'll never find it, and you will have very difficult time learning it from the manuals. Instead, you'd have to read every message on R-help to see how other people use all these tricks (I guess the same applies to Stata and statalist and the Tips section of SJ... but at least there's a systematic way of finding these tricks in Stata world.) That's my biggest objection regarding the whole R approach: it is difficult to learn, especially when your mindset is already in Stata conventions and shortcuts. It might be equally difficult to learn Stata if you've learned a different set of tricks first. Sometimes when I see other people's Stata code, the first thing I say, "Gosh, forget your Fortran habits!" (or SAS habits, or R habits -- oftentimes, one can tell what language this program was translated from, even though the source might have been in one's head rather than in the actual code elsewhere.) This is the line I give people regarding R: It's easy to do difficult > things but hard to do simple things. That's a good one! Mine is: "R is a geeky language for geeks"... and I was giving this line mostly in classes of engineering and computer science students which, to my amazement, were not familiar with Linux. -- Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**re: st: R for Stata Users***From:*"Airey, David C" <david.airey@Vanderbilt.Edu>

**Re: st: R for Stata Users***From:*Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com>

**RE: st: R for Stata Users***From:*"Cohen, Elan" <cohened@upmc.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**st: spmap myseriously dropping a category** - Next by Date:
**st: mata error using optimize()** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: R for Stata Users** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: R for Stata Users** - Index(es):