[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Björn Bünger <13bjbu@wiwi.uni-muenster.de> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
st: using desmat svy reg with dependent variable _x_1 ? |

Date |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:27:31 +0100 |

Dear statalisters, I want to estimate a regression with the following syntax: desmat: svy: reg sathlth obesedum*@docvis Two problems arise: First, the regression is reported using "_X_1" as dependent variable (which I suppose means that the first category of (ordinally scaled) sathlth is used as dependent variable.) The second (and in my opinion more severe) problem is that the other catogories for sathlth are included in the output as independent variables. If I define sathlth as continuous variable (@sathlth) this effect does not occur, but even if I estimate the equation in an ordered probit framework it does (desmat: svy: oprobit sathlth obesedum*@docvis ). How should I proceed if I want to include sathlth only as dependent variable? I'm grateful for advices and hints Björn Bünger Institute of Public Economics University of Münster Germany * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: AW: using desmat svy reg with dependent variable _x_1 ?***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

- Prev by Date:
**st: About the Heckman selection model** - Next by Date:
**st: width between ticks in a graph's axis** - Previous by thread:
**st: About the Heckman selection model** - Next by thread:
**st: AW: using desmat svy reg with dependent variable _x_1 ?** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |