Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

re: st: xtmelogit - a very strange treatment of different levels


From   "Airey, David C" <david.airey@Vanderbilt.Edu>
To   "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   re: st: xtmelogit - a very strange treatment of different levels
Date   Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:48:32 -0600

.

Show your commands and results.

> Dear all,
> 
> I am working with some household panel dataset and in order to check
> for random effects I did both gllamm and xtmelogit regression. While
> in gllamm everything worked fine, xtmelogit did not deal with the two
> levels (individuals and households) the way I expected. Namely, it
> reports the same number of units on both levels (!) and practically no
> random effects either level. Also, the results are practically
> identical to the results when "normal" logit regression is used. Does
> anyone know what this could be about? Thanks a lot.
> 
> Dimitrije

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index