Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: log-likelihood in seemingly unrelated regression


From   nicola.baldini2@unibo.it
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: log-likelihood in seemingly unrelated regression
Date   Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:43:27 +0100

I am not sure if I understand your problem: what about using -di-???
. sysuse auto
. sureg (price foreign weight length) (mpg displ = foreign weight)
[output soppressed]
. di e(ll)
-1236,4583

Nicola
P.S. I'll NOT receive/read any email but the Digest.

At 02.33 10/12/2008 -0500, you wrote:
>To whom it may concern
>
>I am doing the seemingly unrelated regression with STATA, however, the  
>result does not display the log-likelihood. I searched two commands  
>"reglike" and "fitstat" for displaying the log-likelihood. I am not  
>sure which is better for my regression and how to use them. Do I need  
>to download them first? Just add them after sureg step or any other  
>steps? I am using STATA 9.
>
>Thank you very much!
>
>Sincerely,
>Jingjing Li 

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index