Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: log-likelihood in seemingly unrelated regression


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: log-likelihood in seemingly unrelated regression
Date   Tue, 9 Dec 2008 20:24:27 -0000

I can answer part of your question -- only. -reglike- and -fitstat- will
not work for you unless you install them. If you had taken a few seconds
and tried, you really could have worked that out for yourself. 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

jjc.li@utoronto.ca

I am doing the seemingly unrelated regression with STATA, however, the  
result does not display the log-likelihood. I searched two commands  
"reglike" and "fitstat" for displaying the log-likelihood. I am not  
sure which is better for my regression and how to use them. Do I need  
to download them first? Just add them after sureg step or any other  
steps? I am using STATA 9.

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index