[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Stas Kolenikov" <skolenik@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: autocorrelation in Poisson regression, follow-up |

Date |
Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:18:50 -0500 |

Ah, that was a teaser. The three ways I was thinking of were: 1. correlation of the Poission counts themselves: poisson y x L.y -- I cannot think much of any actual process that could generate that sort of dependence 2. correlation of the Poisson rates: y|x is Poisson with rate lambda = function of x and L.lambda. That is sort of weird, too, as it assumes the Poisson rate jumps around exactly at midnight. Or on the 1st of the month, or on the 1st of the year. Again, it should be a pretty strange underlying process to have that sort of dependence. 3. Some sort of dependence in deviance residuals -- but those are derived quantities rather than fundamentals, unlike the standard Gaussian ARMA processes. You can sorta proceed in a two step way -- to run the base regression -glm y x, family(poisson) link(log)- get the residuals out -predict dev, dev-, and run -poisson y x L.dev- to see if the coefficient of the latter is zero or not. But again that's a stupid model. In general, I hate when referees throw something like that without any indication of how they want you to proceed. My referee reports are always a month late, but they have a page of references for two pages of comments. Can you get along by saying something like "There is no established method for checking autocorrelations in Poisson regression, since Poisson processes are intrinsically continuous, and any discretization is arbitrary -- hence testing for autocorrelations would require making arbitrary decisions about the time scales at which the correlations will be present. I will however very much appreciate it if the reviewer could provide a reference if there is anything easily available." On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Antonio Silva <asilva100@live.com> wrote: > > Stas (and others): > > > Thanks for responding to my question. To be honest, I am not sure how to define autocorrelation in this context. I sent out an article for review. The dependent variable is a yearly count variable--number of groups founded. The range is 0-5. I used a simply Poisson regression model with several independent variables. One of the reviewers said the analysis was flawed because I "did not test for autocorrelation on the dependent variable." Unfortunately, the reviewer did not give me any clue as to how to proceed. So I am kind of at a loss here. Essentially, I think the reviewer wanted to make sure the yearly counts were not related to each other in any meaningful way. > > > Any further thoughts are appreciated, and I wish I could tell you more about what I need. > You need a better reviewer :)) -- Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: autocorrelation in Poisson regression, follow-up***From:*"Kieran McCaul" <kamccaul@meddent.uwa.edu.au>

**References**:**st: autocorrelation in Poisson regression, follow-up***From:*Antonio Silva <asilva100@live.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: re: system estimation with dynamic panel** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: autocorrelation in Poisson regression, follow-up** - Previous by thread:
**st: autocorrelation in Poisson regression, follow-up** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: autocorrelation in Poisson regression, follow-up** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |