[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: RE: Bootstrapping Conf Intervals - what do they mean?

From   jverkuilen <>
To   <>
Subject   RE: st: RE: Bootstrapping Conf Intervals - what do they mean?
Date   Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:42:44 -0400

###Does that mean that the only "practical" advantage of the confidence
interval is judging the precision of the study estimate?###

Advantage compared to what?

Leaving aside the issues with what p-values mean, the big advantage I see to interval estimates above hypothesis testing is the direct connection back to the original data. That is presumably what you care about, no?

###The above
discussion suggests that it would be inaccurate to hint that the
study's confidence interval brackets the population estimate.###

Well it depends on what theory of probability you suscribe to. 

If you want to make probability statements about parameters as opposed to samples or functions of samples, i.e., estimators---and I would argue you probably do, but you may disagree---you are going to be going Bayesian. This is because in frequentist statistics the locus of randomness is on (usually hypothetical) repeated sampling from a population. Parameters are not random variables. *Estimators* are because they are functions of the data alone  

The quote from L. J. Savage: To make the Bayesian omelette, you have to break the Bayesian eggs.   


*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index