[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Rodrigo Alfaro A." <ralfaro@bcentral.cl> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: Hausman Test when the RE OLS model includes time-constant variables |

Date |
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:27:56 -0400 |

Pavlos, When you run (FE versus RE+industry_dummies) or (FE versus RE) the Hausman-Test (HT) shows FE>RE. In addition running (FE+cross_dummies versus RE+cross_dummies), HT shows RE>FE. It seems that you have a model like: y(i,t) = b*x(i,t) + a(i,t) + e(i,t), where a(i,t) is unobservable. FE seems to capture many of the variation of a(i,t) with b(i), at least more than RE or RE+dummies. Up to here, I would prefer the FE over the RE model. The realizations of b(i) are not "purely" random, or the random component is correlated with x(i,t). In your second round, your RE seems more appropiate than FE with these pseudo a(i,t)... but note that FE is also "adding" other b(i) in the estimation. There is a competition between [pseudo a(i,t) minus the firm_mean] and other b(i). I am not convinced that you are estimating similar models here. It seems that a more close comparison between RE and FE can be computed with RE+ind_dummies+cross_dummies versus FE+cross_dummies. Anyway, I tend to prefer FE over RE in most of the cases. If you have a good HT supporting that RE>FE, then I would like to know how much variance is the random component adding to the model. My guess is the random component is not adding much to the explained-variance and there is a highly probability that it is not uncorrelated with x(i,t). Best, Rodrigo. -----Mensaje original----- De: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] En nombre de Pavlos C. Symeou Enviado el: Miércoles, 16 de Abril de 2008 08:24 p.m. Para: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Asunto: st: Hausman Test when the RE OLS model includes time-constant variables Dear Statalisters, I have a question regarding the Hausman specification test. I want to include in my OLS model 7 time-constant variables which depict the industry classification of a firm. In order to use the Hausman test, I first estimate the FE model, I store the estimation results, then run the RE model and finally ask Stata for the estimation of the Hausman test. As it is expected, the time-constant variables are dropped from the FE model but not from the RE. This implies that the Hausman test compares two different models; one with time-constant variables and one without. The Hausman test rejects the RE model. If I omit the time-constant variables from the two models, then the Hausman test compares comparable models and still rejects the RE model. Yet, inclusion of the time-constant variables in the OLS model is important for its correct specification so I interact these variables with year dummies and include the interaction variables (and exclude the original time-constant variables) ! in both FE and RE models. I rerun the Hausman test which now rejects the FE in favor of the RE model. I am confronted here with a dilemma where I can only perform the Hausman test if I interact my time-constant variables with year dummies, but what I actually need from my final model is the inclusion of the original time-constant variables, which however leads to the wrong estimation of the Hausman test. I would appreciate if you could advise on this. Should I arbitrarily choose the RE model that can involve the time-constant variables in its estimation? Otherwise? Yours, Pavlos * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ ******************************************************************************** ADVERTENCIA: La información contenida en esta transmisión, y en cualquier archivo adjunto, está sujeta a reserva legal conforme a la normativa aplicable al Banco Central de Chile, y no puede ser usada o difundida por personas distintas de su o sus destinatarios. Si usted ha recibido esta transmisión por error, por favor notifique inmediatamente al remitente respondiendo por este mismo medio y elimínela de su sistema. El Banco Central de Chile no se hará responsable de la exactitud y veracidad de la información contenida en este mensaje, así como de su modificación, copia, divulgación o reenvío, total o parcial. Su uso no autorizado puede ser sancionado de conformidad con las leyes chilenas. El Banco Central de Chile transmite sus decisiones a través de comunicados oficiales, los que pone a disposición del público en su página de Internet: www.bcentral.cl DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this email or any attached file, is subject to legal privilege pursuant to the laws and regulations applicable to the Central Bank of Chile , and may not be used or disseminated by any person other than its intended recipients. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply to this email address and delete it from your system. The Central Bank of Chile shall not be liable for the accuracy or authenticity of the contents of this message, whether amended, copied, forwarded or disclosed in any form, in whole or in part. Please note that unauthorized use may be penalized in conformity with the Chilean law. The Central Bank of Chile communicates its decisions by official releases, and makes them available to the public in its WebPages: www.bcentral.cl * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: Re: Hausman Test when the RE OLS model includes time-constant variables***From:*"Pavlos C. Symeou" <p.symeou@jbs.cam.ac.uk>

**References**:**RE: st: Dependent continuous variable with bounded range***From:*"Pavlos C. Symeou" <p.symeou@jbs.cam.ac.uk>

**RE: st: Dependent continuous variable with bounded range***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**Re: st: Dependent continuous variable with bounded range***From:*"Pavlos C. Symeou" <p.symeou@jbs.cam.ac.uk>

**RE: st: Dependent continuous variable with bounded range***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**st: Hausman Test when the RE OLS model includes time-constant variables***From:*"Pavlos C. Symeou" <p.symeou@jbs.cam.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Baby Got Stats** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: question on calculating power from incidence rates** - Previous by thread:
**st: Hausman Test when the RE OLS model includes time-constant variables** - Next by thread:
**st: Re: Hausman Test when the RE OLS model includes time-constant variables** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |