[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: nl command with restriction |

Date |
Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:55:18 -0000 |

Good point. I was thinking in simpler terms of e.g. a and (1 - a). I know that does not guarantee that either parameter is between 0 and 1, but there is perhaps a difference between gentle force and brute force here. That is, if gentle force does not work and brute force is essential you've learned something about the model fitting. E. Paul Wileyto Rudolfo stated that the parameters are all positive and sum to 1, so the values are going to act like proportions, even if you don't think of them that way. We use this approach all the time to put bounds on estimates. Nick Cox wrote: > Rodolfo's parameters add to 1. His problem differs from that of various > responses that are all proportions and thus add to 1. > > Nick > n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk > > E. Paul Wileyto > > It might be easiest to incorporate a transform into the equation you are > > estimating. -nl- will expect coefficients that range from minus to plus > > infinity. You could get everything you want by transforming as a > multinomial logistic probability. > > suppose you want to estimate A, B, and C which add to 1. -nl- variable > b0.. ranges - to + inf. > > replace the parameters in your equation with : > > A=exp(b0)/(1+exp(b0)+exp(b1)) > B=exp(b1)/(1+exp(b0)+exp(b1) > C=1/(1+exp(b0)+exp(b1)) > > Rodolfo Coelho Prates wrote: > >> I estimated a Cobb-Douglas function with additive error (nl command), >> > the > >> coeficients are negative and the sum are larger than one, in some >> > cases. > >> I need that the coeficients are larger than zero and the sum of the >> coeficients are equal to one. How can I estimate the function with >> restriction in Stata? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: nl command with restriction***From:*"E. Paul Wileyto" <epw@mail.med.upenn.edu>

**References**:**st: truncreg with panel data***From:*Anita <anita.metzger@vtxmail.ch>

**st: RE: truncreg with panel data***From:*Even Bergseng <even.bergseng@umb.no>

**st: nl command with restriction***From:*"Rodolfo Coelho Prates" <rcprates@esalq.usp.br>

**Re: st: nl command with restriction***From:*"E. Paul Wileyto" <epw@mail.med.upenn.edu>

**RE: st: nl command with restriction***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**Re: st: nl command with restriction***From:*"E. Paul Wileyto" <epw@mail.med.upenn.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: Variable generation** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: nl command with restriction** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: Multilvel Model Power Estimation for non-inferiority testing?** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: nl command with restriction** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |