Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: gllamm using stata 10


From   Susan Lingle <susan.lingle@uleth.ca>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: gllamm using stata 10
Date   Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:28:13 -0700

Hi Christian

Please let us know what you find out about Stata 10 and GLLAMM, for many of us are using related analyses.

Thanks,

Susan


Christian Deindl wrote:


everything is up to date.
do-file and dataset are identical.
the only difference is stata 10 instead of stata 9.
I have even tried a different pc. The differences between stata 9 and stata 10 are the same.



Anders Alexandersson schrieb:


Christian Deindl <deindl@soziologie.uzh.ch> wrote:

I have recently updated Stata 9 to Stata 10 and since then I'm getting
quite different results using GLLAMM. [...]

Christian, try to narrow down the problem.
Are Stata 9 and 10 and the user-written command -gllamm- fully updated?
See -help version- and -help which- for version control, and use do-files.

Anders Alexandersson
andersalex@gmail.com
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index