[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: -ciplot- and multiple by options |

Date |
Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:48:25 +0100 |

The Statalist FAQ advises, as good practice, saying where non-official commands come from. -ciplot- is a user-written command on SSC. The help for -ciplot- starts like this: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Plots of confidence intervals ciplot varlist [if exp] [in range] [weight] [, by(byvar) missing ci_options [horizontal | vertical] rcapopts(rcap_options) scatter_options] Description -ciplot- produces a display of means and confidence intervals. Means are shown by point symbols and intervals by capped bars. -ci- is used for the calculations. -aweights- and -fweights- are allowed; see help on -weights-. Options -by()- defines a grouping variable, which is treated as categorical, not measured. [...] scatter_options refers to options of graph twoway scatter. ---------------------------------------------------------------- and inside -ciplot- there is a standard -syntax- statement syntax varlist(numeric) [if] [in] [aweight fweight] /// [ , BY(varname) LEVel(integer $S_level) Poisson BINomial /// Exposure(varname) EXAct Jeffreys Wilson Agresti Total /// Total2(str asis) MISSing INCLusive /// YTItle(str) XTItle(str) /// HORizontal VERTical RCAPopts(str asis) plot(str asis) * ] As far as -ciplot- is concerned -by()- needs a varname (not varlist), as Sergiy reports. So why can he get away with specifying two -by()- options? It is not in general illegal to specify an option twice, and as from Stata 8 much use is made of that in graphics. In this case, what happens with two -by()- options is that the first becomes the -by()- specified explicitly in the -syntax- and the second gets smuggled past the border wrapped up in the wildcard *. -ciplot, by()- was intended to echo -ci, by()- when the latter was part of -ci-'s standard syntax. (Now the overt syntax is to use -by ...: ci- but a -by()- option is still allowed.) This option never had a graphical role. As the help above implies, -ciplot- does two main things, fire up -ci- to get confidence intervals and then fire up -graph- to plot them. If you go with the auto data ciplot price, by(rep78) by(foreign) then -by(rep78)- is used in calculating confidence intervals and -by(foreign) is used in plotting them. The results will look odd and in effect you will get a silly answer to a silly question. I don't feel especially inclined, however, to regard this as a bug, as any user doing this is trying something way beyond the documentation and should expect the possibility of strange consequences. There may be nested categorical variables for which this is an undocumented way of getting a reasonable graph. I suspect that -ciplot- has climbed to the end of its branch of the evolutionary tree. A more versatile command is -stripplot- from SSC. Alternatively, use -egen, group()- before using -ciplot-. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Sergiy Radyakin > In -ciplot- I can not specify multiple variables in the "by()" option, > but I can specify multiple "by()" options each with one variable. I > wonder if ciplot is supposed to work like this? > > The results look quite strangely [Stata v9.2, Windows]: > > sysuse auto > ciplot price, by(foreign) by(rep78) > > or even like this: > > ciplot price, by(rep78) by(foreign) > > Is there any deep statistical motivation for not allowing such graphs? > or is it just bug? > > In any case the above graphs look misleading, when confronted > with the data: > > table rep78 foreign, c(mean price sd price) > > Am I missing something? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: RE: -ciplot- and multiple by options***From:*"Sergiy Radyakin" <serjradyakin@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: -ciplot- and multiple by options***From:*"Sergiy Radyakin" <serjradyakin@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: min and max with dates** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: GLLAMM error: log-likelihood cannot be computed** - Previous by thread:
**st: -ciplot- and multiple by options** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: RE: -ciplot- and multiple by options** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |