Re: st: right shift elements in a matrix

[Phil Schumm <pschumm@uchicago.edu>]

On May 18, 2006, at 5:23 PM, Nick Cox wrote:
> Fine, but your editing is selective. You chopped the reference to - 
> matselrc- from STB-56 in 2000, which does the right thing for names  
> and covers matrices of arbitrary size.

I apologize -- that omission was entirely unintentional.  I was  
honestly unaware of -matselrc- and, what's worse, didn't bother to  
take a look after reading your post.  I must confess that I'm not  
always very good about making use of all of the user-written material  
that's out there, and the loss is entirely mine, in the form of  
wasted time reinventing the wheel.



> I infer from this thread that Mata has no primitives for rotating  
> matrices.

Not that I'm aware of, but I could well have missed it.


-- Phil

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/